APPLICABILITY OF QUANTITATIVE EASING TO DEAL WITH ECONOMIC SHOCKS IN EMERGING ECONOMIES
APPLICABILITY OF QUANTITATIVE EASING TO DEAL WITH ECONOMIC SHOCKS IN EMERGING ECONOMIES
*Corresponding author E-mail: email@example.com
|A R T I C L E I N F O
Article Type: Research
Received: 10, Oct. 2020.
Accepted: 26, Jan. 2021.
Published: 27, Jan. 2021.
|A B S T R A C T
This paper conducts a detailed investigation of the applications of quantitative easing (QE) to tackle the great recession of 2008 and assesses the possibility of using QE as a tool to regain lost strengths of the world economy following the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. A thorough analysis of the scale, frequencies and effects of using QE policies in both developed and developing economies is done. Special attention is paid to how the QE policies adopted by developed economies have affected the developing ones. Applicability and impact of QE policies following endogenous and exogenous economic shock in emerging economies are explored with rigor. Analysis of past QE policies reveals that QEs, in general, have positive impacts on the economies of the adopters. However, in the case of developing and/or emerging economies (EMEs) the impact is mixed. QE interventions can create an immediate impact by driving stagnant economic activities into motion. But if continued/ repeated over long-term, the market mechanism will remain disrupted which will result in serious disparities in the economy, magnify the problem of economic uncertainties (especially in the stock market) and lead the economies to make a choice between severe depression, unemployment, hyperinflation or, a complete systemic collapse. Hence this paper suggests QE interventions only as a short-term measure to withstand the economic shock of the ongoing COVID 19 pandemic.
Quantitative Easing (QE), Economic shocks, COVID 19 pandemic, Emerging economies
 Md. Kamrul Bari MIPA AFA, Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) candidate, Institute of Business Administration, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
 Dr. Shakila Yasmin, Associate Professor and Coordinator of Management Development Program, Institute of Business Administration, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh
 Md. Mirajul Islam, Lecturer, Shekh Fajilatunnesa Mujib University (SFMU), Jamalpur, Bangladesh
Alekseievska, H., & Mumladze, A. (2020). QUANTITATIVE EASING AS THE MAIN INSTRUMENT OF UNCONVENTIONAL MONETARY POLICY. Three Seas Economic Journal, 1(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2020-1-7
Arisanti, I. (2020). HERDING BEHAVIOUR AROUND FED FUND RATE ANNOUNCEMENTS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v10i1.10652
Bartsch, E., Boivin, J., Fischer, S., & Hildebrand, P. (2019). SUERF Policy Note Dealing with the next downturn: From unconventional monetary policy to unprecedented policy coordination. www.suerf.org/policynotes
Bauer, M., & Rudebusch, G. D. (2014). The signaling channel for Federal Reserve bond purchases. International Journal of Central Banking.
Beirne, J., Renzhi, N., Sugandi, E., & Volz, U. (2020). Financial Market and Capital Flow Dynamics During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
BEKAERT, G., CHO, S., & MORENO, A. (2010). New Keynesian Macroeconomics and the Term Structure. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 42(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00277.x
Bernanke, B., Reinhart, V., & Sack, B. (2004). Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound: An Empirical Assessment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2004(2), 1–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2005.0002
Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.27
Buiter, W. H. (2014). The Simple Analytics of Helicopter Money: Why It Works — Always. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-28
Caballero, R. J., & Simsek, A. (2020). A Model of Asset Price Spirals and Aggregate Demand Amplification of a” Covid-19″ Shock. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Canova, F. (2005). The transmission of US shocks to Latin America. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.837
Carriero, A., Clark, T. E., & Marcellino, M. G. (2018). Endogenous uncertainty.
Central Bank of Ireland. (2020). How does Quantitative Easing work | Central Bank of Ireland. Web Page. https://www.centralbank.ie/consumer-hub/explainers/how-does-quantitative-easing-work
Chakrabarti, A. (2015). Organizational adaptation in an economic shock: The role of growth reconfiguration. Strategic Management Journal, 36(11), 1717–1738. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2309
Christensen, J. H. E., & Gillan, J. M. (2017). Does Quantitative Easing Affect Market Liquidity? Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper Series, 01–46. https://doi.org/10.24148/wp2013-26
Chuffart, T., & Dell’Eva, C. (2020). The role of carry trades on the effectiveness of Japan’s quantitative easing. International Economics, 161, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.11.001
Clouse, J., Henderson, D., Orphanides, A., Small, D. H., & Tinsley, P. A. (2003). Monetary Policy When the Nominal Short-Term Interest Rate is Zero. Topics in Macroeconomics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-5998.1088
de Haan, L., & van den End, J. W. (2018). The signalling content of asset prices for inflation: Implications for quantitative easing. Economic Systems, 42(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.08.006
Dornbusch, R., Park, Y. C., & Claessens, S. (2000). Contagion: Understanding How It Spreads. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.177
Fabo, B., Jančoková, M., Kempf, E., & Pástor, Ľ. (2020). Fifty Shades of QE: Conflicts of Interest in Economic Research. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Fernandez, R., Bortz, P., Zeolla, N., & Schupp, F. (2018). The politics of quantitative easing. 68. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/57257789/Report-Quantitive-Easing-_final.pdf?1535430169=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_politics_of_quantitative_easing._A_c.pdf&Expires=1594751633&Signature=BYzLDScdaV-hjGNY7Yp6nB~Zc2oiIYr-UGYt
FRATIANNI, M., HAGEN, J. VON, & WALLER, C. (1997). CENTRAL BANKING AS A POLITICAL PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEM. Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01917.x
Gagnon, J., Raskin, M., Remache, J., & Sack, B. (2018). The financial market effects of the Federal Reserve’s large-scale asset purchases. 24th Issue (Mar 2011) of the International Journal of Central Banking.
Gleason, K. C., Mathur, I., & Peterson, M. A. (2004). Analysis of intraday herding behavior among the sector ETFs. Journal of Empirical Finance, 11(5), 681–694.
Gnan, E., & Masciandaro, D. (2016). Central banking and Monetary Policy: What Will Be the Post-Crisis New Normal? Central Banking and Monetary Policy, 7.
Greenwood, J. (2017). The Japanese experience with QE and QQE. Cato J., 37, 17.
Guerrieri, V., Lorenzoni, G., Straub, L., & Werning, I. (2020). Macroeconomic Implications of COVID-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages? https://doi.org/10.3386/w26918
Hartley, J., & Rebucci, A. (2020). An Event Study of COVID-19 Central Bank Quantitative Easing in Advanced and Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27339
Hong, K., Lee, J.-W., & Tang, H. C. (2010). Crises in Asia: Historical perspectives and implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 21(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2009.07.006
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Joyce, M., Miles, D., Scott, A., & Vayanos, D. (2012). Quantitative Easing and Unconventional Monetary Policy – an Introduction. The Economic Journal, 122(564), F271–F288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02551.x
Kapetanios, G., Mumtaz, H., Stevens, I., & Theodoridis, K. (2012). Assessing the Economy‐wide Effects of Quantitative Easing. The Economic Journal, 122(564), F316–F347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02555.x
Kremer, S., & Nautz, D. (2013). Causes and consequences of short-term institutional herding. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1676–1686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.006
Krishnamurthy, A., & Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011). The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Interest Rates: Channels and Implications for Policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2011(2), 215–287. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2011.0019
Lavigne, R., Sarker, S., & Vasishtha, G. (2014). Spillover effects of quantitative easing on emerging-market economies. Bank of Canada Review, 2014(Autumn), 23–33. https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/boc-review-autumn14-lavigne.pdf
Lim, J. J., & Mohapatra, S. (2016). Quantitative easing and the post-crisis surge in financial flows to developing countries. Journal of International Money and Finance, 68, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.02.009
MacDonald, M. (2017). International capital market frictions and spillovers from quantitative easing. Journal of International Money and Finance, 70, 135–156.
Matousek, R., Papadamou, S. Τ., Šević, A., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2019). The effectiveness of quantitative easing: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Money and Finance, 99, 102068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102068
Meszaros, J., & Olson, E. (2020). The effects of U.S. quantitative easing on South Africa. Review of Financial Economics, 38(2), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1074
Mishkin, F. S., & Eakins, S. G. (2015). Financial markets and institutions. In The Pearson series in finance CN – HG181 .M558 2015 (Eighth edi). Pearson.
Miyakoshi, T., Li, K.-W., Shimada, J., & Tsukuda, Y. (2020). The impact of quantitative easing and carry trade on the real estate market in Hong Kong. International Review of Economics & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.05.006
Papadamou, S., Kyriazis, N. A., & Tzeremes, P. G. (2019). Spillover Effects of US QE and QE Tapering on African and Middle Eastern Stock Indices. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12020057
Sung, T., & Kim, J.-H. (2016). Unconventional Monetary Policy, Global Liquidity Circulation, and Inflation Divergence around the World. The Developing Economies, 54(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/deve.12096
Thorbecke, W. (2020). Non-traditional Monetary Policy and the Future of the Financial Industries.
Tybout, J., & Bark, T. (1988). Macro Shocks and Industrial Portfolio Responses: An Econometric Model for LDCs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(4), 559. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935818
Verbeke, A. (2020). Will the COVID‐19 Pandemic Really Change the Governance of Global Value Chains? British Journal of Management, 31(3), 444–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12422
Xing, V. (2017). Central Bank Quantitative Easing as an Emerging Political Liability.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.